Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Predicting Probabilities

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

1. What is Predicting Probabilities?

  • The predict_proba method estimates the probability that a given input belongs to each class.
  • It returns values in the range [0, 1], representing the model's confidence as probabilities.
  • The sum of predicted probabilities across all classes for a sample is always 1 (i.e., they form a valid probability distribution).

2. Output Shape of predict_proba

  • For binary classification, the shape of the output is (n_samples, 2):
  • Column 0: Probability of the sample belonging to the negative class.
  • Column 1: Probability of the sample belonging to the positive class.
  • For multiclass classification, the shape is (n_samples, n_classes), with each column corresponding to the probability of the sample belonging to that class.

3. Interpretation of predict_proba Output

  • The probability reflects how confidently the model believes a data point belongs to each class.
  • For example, in binary classification:

Input Sample

Predicted Probability (Negative Class)

Predicted Probability (Positive Class)

1

0.2

0.8

2

0.9

0.1
  • The model predicts positive class if the positive class probability is greater than a threshold (default 0.5).

4. Relation to Thresholding and Classification

  • The default threshold for making classification decisions is 0.5:
  • If predict_proba for positive class > 0.5, sample is classified as positive.
  • Otherwise, it is classified as negative.
  • You can adjust this threshold depending on the problem, which affects false positive and false negative rates.
  • Adjusting thresholds can optimize metrics like precision, recall, F-score, especially on imbalanced datasets.

5. Calibration of Probability Estimates

  • Not all models produce well-calibrated probabilities.
  • A calibrated model outputs probabilities that closely match true likelihoods.
  • Example of a poor calibration: a decision tree grown to full depth might assign probability 1 or 0, but be often wrong.
  • Calibration can be improved using methods like:
  • Platt scaling
  • Isotonic regression
  • Reference: Paper by Niculescu-Mizil and Caruana, “Predicting Good Probabilities with Supervised Learning”.

6. Examples Using predict_proba (from the book)

  • Using a GradientBoostingClassifier on toy datasets:
# Suppose gbrt is a trained GradientBoostingClassifier
print("Shape of probabilities:", gbrt.predict_proba(X_test).shape)
# Output:
# Shape of probabilities: (n_samples, 2)
 
print("Predicted probabilities:\n", gbrt.predict_proba(X_test[:6]))
  • Output shows actual predicted probabilities for each class:
[[0.1 0.9]
[0.8 0.2]
[0.7 0.3]
...
]
  • The first column corresponds to the first class probability, the second column to the second class.

7. Advantages of predict_proba

  • Provides interpretable uncertainty estimates in terms of probabilities.
  • Useful for decision making where probabilistic thresholds are preferable to hard decisions.
  • Can be integrated into pipelines that weigh risks (e.g., medical diagnosis, fraud detection).
  • Helps in ranking samples by probability to prioritize further analysis.

8. Relationship Between predict_proba and decision_function

  • Some classifiers implement both decision_function and predict_proba:
  • decision_function returns raw scores or margins.
  • predict_proba converts these scores to probabilities.
  • Probabilities are usually obtained by applying a logistic function or softmax on the decision function scores.
  • Calibrated models provide better probability estimates compared to raw scores alone,.

9. Practical Considerations

  • When probabilities are needed (e.g., for risk assessment), prefer models supporting predict_proba.
  • Be cautious that probabilities are only as good as model calibration.
  • Always validate probabilities with calibration plots or metrics like Brier score.

10. Summary Table

Aspect

Details

Purpose

Provides class membership probabilities

Output Shape

Binary: (n_samples, 2), Multiclass: (n_samples, n_classes)

Values

Probabilities between 0 and 1, sum to 1 per sample

Default threshold

0.5 for binary classification

Calibration

Models may need calibration for accurate probabilities

Applications

Threshold tuning, risk assessment, ranking predictions

Relation

Derived from decision_function scores via logistic or softmax

Example Models

GradientBoostingClassifier, Logistic Regression, Random Forest

 

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Conducting a Qualitative Analysis

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Conducting a qualitative analysis in biomechanics involves a systematic process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting non-numerical data to gain insights into human movement patterns, behaviors, and interactions. Here are the key steps involved in conducting a qualitative analysis in biomechanics: 1.     Data Collection : o     Use appropriate data collection methods such as video recordings, observational notes, interviews, or focus groups to capture qualitative information about human movement. o     Ensure that data collection is conducted in a systematic and consistent manner to gather rich and detailed insights. 2.     Data Organization : o     Organize the collected qualitative data systematically, such as transcribing interviews, categorizing observational notes, or indexing video recordings for easy reference during analysis. o     Use qualitative data management tools or software to f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ensembles of Decision Trees

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Ensembles? Ensemble methods combine multiple machine learning models to create more powerful and robust models. By aggregating the predictions of many models, ensembles typically achieve better generalization performance than any single model. In the context of decision trees, ensembles combine multiple trees to overcome limitations of single trees such as overfitting and instability. 2. Why Ensemble Decision Trees? Single decision trees: Are easy to interpret but tend to overfit training data, leading to poor generalization,. Can be unstable because small variations in data can change the structure of the tree significantly. Ensemble methods exploit the idea that many weak learners (trees that individually overfit or only capture partial patterns) can be combined to form a strong learner by reducing variance and sometimes bias. 3. Two Main Types of Tree Ensembles (a) Random Forests Random forests are ensembles con...
Post a Comment
Read more