Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Manifestation of blindness-induced Neuroplasticity at different scales

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak


 Blindness-induced neuroplasticity manifests at different scales within the brain, reflecting the adaptive changes that occur in response to the loss of vision. Here are some manifestations of blindness-induced neuroplasticity at different scales:

1. Neurotransmitter Level: At the neurotransmitter level, blindness can lead to alterations in the balance between inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitters in the brain. These changes in neurotransmitter activity can influence the overall excitability and functioning of neural circuits, contributing to adaptive responses to vision loss.

2. Cortical Reorganization: Blindness can result in cortical reorganization, where areas of the brain that were originally dedicated to processing visual information undergo functional changes to accommodate non-visual functions. For example, the visual cortex may be repurposed for processing tactile or auditory information, reflecting the brain's ability to adapt to the absence of visual input.

3. Structural Changes: Blindness-induced neuroplasticity can also lead to structural changes in the brain, such as alterations in gray matter volume or cortical thickness. Studies have shown that the visual pathway and cortical areas may exhibit differences in structural organization in response to vision loss, with late blindness potentially inducing less structural changes compared to early blindness.

4. Cross-Modal Plasticity: One of the key manifestations of blindness-induced neuroplasticity is cross-modal plasticity, where the brain integrates information from different sensory modalities to compensate for the loss of vision. This adaptive reorganization can occur at the level of the primary sensory cortex (V1) and lead to enhanced processing of non-visual sensory inputs, such as tactile or auditory information.

5. Functional Connectivity: Changes in resting-state functional connectivity have been observed in blind individuals, reflecting alterations in how different brain regions communicate in the absence of vision. Studies have shown weakened connectivity within the visual cortex and between visual and other sensory regions following vision loss, with potential restoration of connectivity patterns after sight recovery interventions.

6. Experience-Dependent Plasticity: The manifestation of blindness-induced neuroplasticity can also be experience-dependent, with factors such as early exposure to tactile stimuli influencing the degree of cortical reorganization and sensory processing enhancements in blind individuals. For example, learning Braille at an early age has been associated with higher tactile-induced visual responses, highlighting the role of experience in shaping neuroplastic changes.

 

By examining blindness-induced neuroplasticity at different scales, researchers can gain insights into the adaptive mechanisms that underlie the brain's ability to reorganize and compensate for the loss of vision. Understanding these manifestations is essential for developing targeted interventions and rehabilitation strategies to optimize sensory processing and functional outcomes in individuals with visual impairments.

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ensembles of Decision Trees

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Ensembles? Ensemble methods combine multiple machine learning models to create more powerful and robust models. By aggregating the predictions of many models, ensembles typically achieve better generalization performance than any single model. In the context of decision trees, ensembles combine multiple trees to overcome limitations of single trees such as overfitting and instability. 2. Why Ensemble Decision Trees? Single decision trees: Are easy to interpret but tend to overfit training data, leading to poor generalization,. Can be unstable because small variations in data can change the structure of the tree significantly. Ensemble methods exploit the idea that many weak learners (trees that individually overfit or only capture partial patterns) can be combined to form a strong learner by reducing variance and sometimes bias. 3. Two Main Types of Tree Ensembles (a) Random Forests Random forests are ensembles con...
Post a Comment
Read more

Predicting Probabilities

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is Predicting Probabilities? The predict_proba method estimates the probability that a given input belongs to each class. It returns values in the range [0, 1] , representing the model's confidence as probabilities. The sum of predicted probabilities across all classes for a sample is always 1 (i.e., they form a valid probability distribution). 2. Output Shape of predict_proba For binary classification , the shape of the output is (n_samples, 2) : Column 0: Probability of the sample belonging to the negative class. Column 1: Probability of the sample belonging to the positive class. For multiclass classification , the shape is (n_samples, n_classes) , with each column corresponding to the probability of the sample belonging to that class. 3. Interpretation of predict_proba Output The probability reflects how confidently the model believes a data point belongs to each class. For example, in ...
Post a Comment
Read more