Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...

How does sensorimotor mu rhythm activity impact corticospinal output during TMS delivery?


Sensorimotor mu rhythm activity plays a significant role in influencing corticospinal output during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivery. The sensorimotor mu rhythm is an oscillatory brain activity that occurs in the frequency range of 8-13 Hz and is predominantly observed over sensorimotor cortical regions. Here is how sensorimotor mu rhythm activity impacts corticospinal output during TMS delivery:


1.     Phase-Dependent Effects: Studies have shown that the phase of the sensorimotor mu rhythm can influence corticospinal excitability. Specifically, corticospinal output is modulated by the phase of the mu rhythm, with increased excitability observed during specific phases of the mu rhythm cycle. For example, corticospinal output tends to be higher during the trough (negative peak) phases of the mu rhythm compared to the peak (positive peak) phases.

2.     Enhancement vs. Suppression: When TMS is delivered to the primary motor cortex (M1) during the trough phases of the mu rhythm, it can lead to enhanced corticospinal transmission and improved motor learning. In contrast, TMS delivered during the peak phases of the mu rhythm may result in weaker corticospinal transmission and have less impact on motor learning. This phase-dependent effect highlights the importance of timing TMS interventions based on the ongoing sensorimotor mu rhythm activity.

3.     Interhemispheric Communication: In addition to influencing corticospinal output, sensorimotor mu rhythm activity also affects interhemispheric communication between homologous motor cortex regions. Studies have demonstrated that the phase synchronicity of the mu rhythm can determine the efficacy of communication between motor cortices, further emphasizing the role of mu rhythm activity in shaping neural interactions.

4.     Complex Interplay: The interplay between sensorimotor mu rhythm phase and power is complex and interdependent in shaping corticospinal tract activity. Both the phase and power of the mu rhythm contribute to modulating corticospinal output, highlighting the need to consider both aspects when utilizing TMS for measurement or interventional purposes.


In conclusion, sensorimotor mu rhythm activity exerts a significant influence on corticospinal output during TMS delivery, with phase-dependent effects playing a crucial role in modulating neural excitability and motor learning processes. Understanding and leveraging the impact of mu rhythm activity can enhance the efficacy of TMS interventions and provide insights into the mechanisms underlying motor control and plasticity in the human brain.

 

 

Hussain, S. J., Claudino, L., Bönstrup, M., Norato, G., Cruciani, G., Thompson, R., ... Cohen, L. G. (2019). Sensorimotor oscillatory phase–power interaction gates resting human corticospinal output. Cerebral Cortex, 29(9), 3766–3777. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy255.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....

Linear Models

1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...

Conducting a Qualitative Analysis

Conducting a qualitative analysis in biomechanics involves a systematic process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting non-numerical data to gain insights into human movement patterns, behaviors, and interactions. Here are the key steps involved in conducting a qualitative analysis in biomechanics: 1.     Data Collection : o     Use appropriate data collection methods such as video recordings, observational notes, interviews, or focus groups to capture qualitative information about human movement. o     Ensure that data collection is conducted in a systematic and consistent manner to gather rich and detailed insights. 2.     Data Organization : o     Organize the collected qualitative data systematically, such as transcribing interviews, categorizing observational notes, or indexing video recordings for easy reference during analysis. o     Use qualitative data management tools or software to f...

Predicting Probabilities

1. What is Predicting Probabilities? The predict_proba method estimates the probability that a given input belongs to each class. It returns values in the range [0, 1] , representing the model's confidence as probabilities. The sum of predicted probabilities across all classes for a sample is always 1 (i.e., they form a valid probability distribution). 2. Output Shape of predict_proba For binary classification , the shape of the output is (n_samples, 2) : Column 0: Probability of the sample belonging to the negative class. Column 1: Probability of the sample belonging to the positive class. For multiclass classification , the shape is (n_samples, n_classes) , with each column corresponding to the probability of the sample belonging to that class. 3. Interpretation of predict_proba Output The probability reflects how confidently the model believes a data point belongs to each class. For example, in ...