Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

How can one distinguish between a well-formed photic driving response and photomyogenic artifact?

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

Distinguishing between a well-formed photic driving response and photomyogenic artifact in EEG recordings involves careful analysis of several key characteristics. Here are the main points to consider:

1.      Waveform Characteristics:

o  Photic Driving Response: This response typically exhibits a well-defined, rhythmic pattern that corresponds to the frequency of the photic stimulation (e.g., strobe lights). The waveforms are usually consistent and show a clear relationship to the stimulus frequency.

o Photomyogenic Artifact: In contrast, photomyogenic artifacts arise from involuntary muscle contractions, which may not produce a consistent rhythmic pattern. These artifacts can appear more irregular and may not align precisely with the photic stimulation frequency.

2.     Location of Activity:

o Photic Driving Response: This response is generally more widespread across the scalp, particularly in the occipital region, where visual processing occurs. It tends to have a more uniform distribution.

o   Photomyogenic Artifact: This artifact is often localized to specific areas, particularly in the frontal region, where muscle activity (e.g., from facial muscles) is more pronounced. The activity may not spread evenly across the scalp.

3.     Frequency Content:

o Photic Driving Response: The frequency of the response will closely match the frequency of the photic stimulus, showing a clear and consistent frequency pattern.

o  Photomyogenic Artifact: The frequency content of photomyogenic artifacts may not correspond to the stimulus frequency and can include a broader range of frequencies due to the nature of muscle contractions.

4.    Response to Stimulation:

o Photic Driving Response: A well-formed photic driving response will typically show a clear increase in amplitude and synchronization with the photic stimulus, demonstrating a direct relationship between the stimulus and the EEG response.

o Photomyogenic Artifact: The amplitude of photomyogenic artifacts may not change significantly with variations in the photic stimulus and may appear more sporadic or inconsistent.

5.     Contrast with Background Activity:

o Photic Driving Response: This response often stands out against the background EEG activity, especially during stimulation, due to its rhythmic and synchronized nature.

o Photomyogenic Artifact: While photomyogenic artifacts can also stand out, they may not have the same rhythmic quality and can be confused with other types of muscle activity or noise.

By carefully evaluating these characteristics, clinicians can differentiate between a well-formed photic driving response and photomyogenic artifact, leading to more accurate interpretations of EEG recordings.

 

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Predicting Probabilities

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is Predicting Probabilities? The predict_proba method estimates the probability that a given input belongs to each class. It returns values in the range [0, 1] , representing the model's confidence as probabilities. The sum of predicted probabilities across all classes for a sample is always 1 (i.e., they form a valid probability distribution). 2. Output Shape of predict_proba For binary classification , the shape of the output is (n_samples, 2) : Column 0: Probability of the sample belonging to the negative class. Column 1: Probability of the sample belonging to the positive class. For multiclass classification , the shape is (n_samples, n_classes) , with each column corresponding to the probability of the sample belonging to that class. 3. Interpretation of predict_proba Output The probability reflects how confidently the model believes a data point belongs to each class. For example, in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty in Multiclass Classification

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is Uncertainty in Classification? Uncertainty refers to the model’s confidence or doubt in its predictions. Quantifying uncertainty is important to understand how reliable each prediction is. In multiclass classification , uncertainty estimates provide probabilities over multiple classes, reflecting how sure the model is about each possible class. 2. Methods to Estimate Uncertainty in Multiclass Classification Most multiclass classifiers provide methods such as: predict_proba: Returns a probability distribution across all classes. decision_function: Returns scores or margins for each class (sometimes called raw or uncalibrated confidence scores). The probability distribution from predict_proba captures the uncertainty by assigning a probability to each class. 3. Shape and Interpretation of predict_proba in Multiclass Output shape: (n_samples, n_classes) Each row corresponds to the probabilities of ...
Post a Comment
Read more