Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Muscles Artifacts Compared to Photo paroxysmal Responses.

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

Muscle artifacts and photoparoxysmal responses in EEG recordings can exhibit differences in waveform, localization, and response to stimulation. 

1.     Waveform:

o    Muscle Artifacts: Muscle artifacts typically have a spike-like or sharp waveform due to the individual motor unit potentials involved in muscle contractions. The waveform of muscle artifacts is often characterized by rapid and abrupt changes in amplitude.

o Photoparoxysmal Responses: Photoparoxysmal responses, on the other hand, may exhibit spike-and-wave complexes or other epileptiform patterns in response to visual stimulation. These responses often have a more stereotyped waveform compared to the variable nature of muscle artifacts.

2.   Localization:

o    Muscle Artifacts: Muscle artifacts are commonly localized near electrodes overlaying muscle groups generating the artifact, such as facial muscles or tongue muscles. The distribution of muscle artifacts reflects the locations of the muscles involved in the artifact.

oPhotoparoxysmal Responses: Photoparoxysmal responses often have fields with a frontal maximum, indicating a characteristic localization pattern in the frontal regions of the brain. This localization differs from the more diffuse distribution of muscle artifacts.

3.   Response to Stimulation:

oMuscle Artifacts: Muscle artifacts are typically not modulated by external stimuli and are primarily related to muscle contractions or movements. They do not exhibit specific responses to sensory or visual stimulation.

oPhotoparoxysmal Responses: Photoparoxysmal responses are triggered by visual stimulation, particularly flickering lights or specific visual patterns. These responses are time-locked to the stimulation and may show a consistent association with the visual trigger.

4.   Persistence:

o Muscle Artifacts: Muscle artifacts are transient and typically occur during muscle activity, with onset and offset corresponding to muscle contractions. They do not persist beyond the period of muscle activity.

oPhotoparoxysmal Responses: Photoparoxysmal responses may continue beyond the period of visual stimulation, indicating an ongoing epileptiform response in the brain. These responses can outlast the duration of the visual trigger.

5.    Frequency of Occurrence:

o    Muscle Artifacts: Muscle artifacts are commonly observed in EEG recordings due to muscle contractions or movements, especially in regions with underlying muscles. They may occur intermittently during muscle activity.

oPhotoparoxysmal Responses: Photoparoxysmal responses are specific EEG patterns triggered by visual stimuli and may occur at specific stimulation frequencies. These responses are more selective in their occurrence compared to the more widespread presence of muscle artifacts.

Understanding these distinctions between muscle artifacts and photoparoxysmal responses is essential for accurate EEG interpretation and the differentiation of physiological muscle activity from abnormal epileptiform responses triggered by external stimuli. Recognizing the waveform characteristics, localization patterns, response to stimulation, and persistence of these phenomena can aid in distinguishing between artifact-induced signals and pathological EEG patterns.

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Predicting Probabilities

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is Predicting Probabilities? The predict_proba method estimates the probability that a given input belongs to each class. It returns values in the range [0, 1] , representing the model's confidence as probabilities. The sum of predicted probabilities across all classes for a sample is always 1 (i.e., they form a valid probability distribution). 2. Output Shape of predict_proba For binary classification , the shape of the output is (n_samples, 2) : Column 0: Probability of the sample belonging to the negative class. Column 1: Probability of the sample belonging to the positive class. For multiclass classification , the shape is (n_samples, n_classes) , with each column corresponding to the probability of the sample belonging to that class. 3. Interpretation of predict_proba Output The probability reflects how confidently the model believes a data point belongs to each class. For example, in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty in Multiclass Classification

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is Uncertainty in Classification? Uncertainty refers to the model’s confidence or doubt in its predictions. Quantifying uncertainty is important to understand how reliable each prediction is. In multiclass classification , uncertainty estimates provide probabilities over multiple classes, reflecting how sure the model is about each possible class. 2. Methods to Estimate Uncertainty in Multiclass Classification Most multiclass classifiers provide methods such as: predict_proba: Returns a probability distribution across all classes. decision_function: Returns scores or margins for each class (sometimes called raw or uncalibrated confidence scores). The probability distribution from predict_proba captures the uncertainty by assigning a probability to each class. 3. Shape and Interpretation of predict_proba in Multiclass Output shape: (n_samples, n_classes) Each row corresponds to the probabilities of ...
Post a Comment
Read more