Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

What are some key features of photomyogenic artifacts in EEG recordings?

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak


Photomyogenic artifacts in EEG recordings are characterized by several key features that help distinguish them from other types of artifacts and brain activity. Here are the main features:


1.      Origin:

oPhotomyogenic artifacts are caused by involuntary muscle contractions, particularly in response to photic stimulation (e.g., strobe lights). These contractions can occur in facial or neck muscles, leading to electrical activity that is recorded by the EEG.

2.     Waveform Characteristics:

o The waveforms of photomyogenic artifacts typically have a sharp contour and may appear less rhythmic compared to other types of muscle artifacts. They can resemble EMG activity but are distinct in their response to photic stimulation.

3.     Frequency Content:

o Photomyogenic artifacts often contain high-frequency components, usually above 20 Hz, which can overlap with the frequency range of beta activity. This high-frequency content is a distinguishing feature that sets them apart from slower brain wave activity.

4.    Location:

o These artifacts are primarily observed in the frontal region of the scalp, where the underlying muscle activity is most pronounced. They may also be seen in other areas depending on the muscle contractions involved.

5.     Response to Stimulation:

o Photomyogenic artifacts can be time-locked to the photic stimulation, meaning they occur in synchronization with the strobe light. However, they may not always show a consistent pattern in relation to the stimulus frequency, making them less predictable than a well-formed photic driving response.

6.    Amplitude Variability:

o The amplitude of photomyogenic artifacts can vary significantly, often depending on the intensity of the muscle contractions and the individual's response to the photic stimulus. This variability can complicate their interpretation.

7.     Distinction from Other Artifacts:

o Photomyogenic artifacts can be differentiated from other types of artifacts, such as electroretinograms (which are time-locked to the stimulus and have a different waveform) and EMG artifacts (which may not be time-locked and can have a different frequency profile).

8.    Clinical Relevance:

o Recognizing photomyogenic artifacts is crucial in clinical settings, as they can mimic or obscure true neurological activity, potentially leading to misinterpretation of EEG findings.

By understanding these key features, clinicians and EEG technologists can better identify and interpret photomyogenic artifacts in EEG recordings, ensuring more accurate assessments of brain activity.

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ensembles of Decision Trees

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Ensembles? Ensemble methods combine multiple machine learning models to create more powerful and robust models. By aggregating the predictions of many models, ensembles typically achieve better generalization performance than any single model. In the context of decision trees, ensembles combine multiple trees to overcome limitations of single trees such as overfitting and instability. 2. Why Ensemble Decision Trees? Single decision trees: Are easy to interpret but tend to overfit training data, leading to poor generalization,. Can be unstable because small variations in data can change the structure of the tree significantly. Ensemble methods exploit the idea that many weak learners (trees that individually overfit or only capture partial patterns) can be combined to form a strong learner by reducing variance and sometimes bias. 3. Two Main Types of Tree Ensembles (a) Random Forests Random forests are ensembles con...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Decision Functions

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is the Decision Function? The decision_function method is provided by many classifiers in scikit-learn. It returns a continuous score for each sample, representing the classifier’s confidence or margin. This score reflects how strongly the model favors one class over another in binary classification, or a more complex set of scores in multiclass classification. 2. Shape and Output of decision_function For binary classification , the output shape is (n_samples,). Each value is a floating-point number indicating the degree to which the sample belongs to the positive class. Positive values indicate a preference for the positive class; negative values indicate a preference for the negative class. For multiclass classification , the output is usually a 2D array of shape (n_samples, n_classes), providing scores for each class. 3. Interpretation of decision_function Scores The sign of the value (positive or...
Post a Comment
Read more