Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Electrode Location Names according to the International 10-10 System

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

In the International 10-10 System, electrode location names are standardized to provide a consistent method for electrode placement in EEG recordings. Here are the electrode location names according to the International 10-10 System:

1.      Fp1, Fp2: Frontopolar (Prefrontal)

2.     F3, F4: Frontal

3.     C3, C4: Central

4.    P3, P4: Parietal

5.     O1, O2: Occipital

6.    F7, F8: Frontal

7.     T3, T4: Temporal

8.    T5, T6: Temporal

9.    Fz: Midline Frontal

10. Cz: Midline Central

11.  Pz: Midline Parietal

The International 10-10 System provides a more detailed and standardized approach to electrode naming compared to the 10-20 System, allowing for precise electrode placement and accurate recording of EEG activity from specific brain regions.

International 10-10 System Rules

The International 10-10 System is an extension of the 10-20 System that provides more detailed electrode placement guidelines for EEG recordings. Here are some key rules of the International 10-10 System:


1.      Naming Convention:

o    Electrodes are named based on their location relative to the midline and hemisphere.

o    The letter prefix indicates the region of the head (e.g., F for frontal, C for central).

o    The number suffix indicates the percentage distance from the midline (e.g., 10% or 20%).

2.     Consistency:

o Electrode names are consistent with their anatomical locations, allowing for easy identification of recording sites.

o  The naming convention ensures uniformity in electrode placement across different EEG recordings.

3.     Detailed Naming:

o    The system provides more detailed electrode names compared to the 10-20 System, allowing for precise localization of brain activity.

o    Electrodes are named based on their specific positions within each region, providing a comprehensive mapping of the scalp.

4.    Improved Accuracy:

o  The International 10-10 System enhances the accuracy of electrode placement by specifying locations with greater precision.

o  Clinicians and researchers can target specific brain regions more effectively for EEG data collection and analysis.

5.     Standardization:

o  Standardized rules for electrode naming and placement promote consistency in EEG recordings within and across institutions.

o    Adhering to the 10-10 System guidelines ensures that EEG data can be interpreted accurately and compared reliably.

6.    Compatibility:

o    The International 10-10 System is compatible with the 10-20 System, allowing for integration of both systems in EEG studies.

o    Researchers and clinicians can choose the system that best suits their needs while maintaining compatibility with established practices.

By following the rules of the International 10-10 System, EEG technicians and researchers can achieve precise and standardized electrode placement, leading to accurate recording and interpretation of brain activity in EEG studies.

 

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Predicting Probabilities

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is Predicting Probabilities? The predict_proba method estimates the probability that a given input belongs to each class. It returns values in the range [0, 1] , representing the model's confidence as probabilities. The sum of predicted probabilities across all classes for a sample is always 1 (i.e., they form a valid probability distribution). 2. Output Shape of predict_proba For binary classification , the shape of the output is (n_samples, 2) : Column 0: Probability of the sample belonging to the negative class. Column 1: Probability of the sample belonging to the positive class. For multiclass classification , the shape is (n_samples, n_classes) , with each column corresponding to the probability of the sample belonging to that class. 3. Interpretation of predict_proba Output The probability reflects how confidently the model believes a data point belongs to each class. For example, in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ensembles of Decision Trees

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Ensembles? Ensemble methods combine multiple machine learning models to create more powerful and robust models. By aggregating the predictions of many models, ensembles typically achieve better generalization performance than any single model. In the context of decision trees, ensembles combine multiple trees to overcome limitations of single trees such as overfitting and instability. 2. Why Ensemble Decision Trees? Single decision trees: Are easy to interpret but tend to overfit training data, leading to poor generalization,. Can be unstable because small variations in data can change the structure of the tree significantly. Ensemble methods exploit the idea that many weak learners (trees that individually overfit or only capture partial patterns) can be combined to form a strong learner by reducing variance and sometimes bias. 3. Two Main Types of Tree Ensembles (a) Random Forests Random forests are ensembles con...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more