Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

The Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is a comprehensive tool used to assess and evaluate the severity of Parkinson's disease symptoms in patients. Here is an overview of the MDS-UPDRS and its significance in clinical practice and research:


1.      Purpose:

o The MDS-UPDRS is designed to provide a standardized and comprehensive assessment of both motor and non-motor symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease.

o It helps clinicians and researchers evaluate the progression of Parkinson's disease, monitor treatment effectiveness, and make informed decisions regarding patient care.

2.     Components:

o    The MDS-UPDRS consists of four parts:

§  Part I: Non-Motor Experiences of Daily Living

§  Part II: Motor Experiences of Daily Living

§  Part III: Motor Examination

§  Part IV: Motor Complications

o Each part focuses on different aspects of Parkinson's disease symptoms, including motor function, activities of daily living, motor complications, and non-motor experiences.

3.     Scoring:

o The MDS-UPDRS uses a standardized scoring system to assess the severity of symptoms in each domain.

o  Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity or impairment, while lower scores suggest better functioning.

o The total score is calculated by summing the scores from each part, providing an overall measure of disease severity and impact on the patient's daily life.

4.    Clinical Utility:

o The MDS-UPDRS is widely used in clinical practice and research settings to evaluate the motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease.

o  It helps clinicians track disease progression, adjust treatment plans, and assess the effectiveness of interventions such as medication adjustments, deep brain stimulation, or physical therapy.

5.     Research Applications:

o In research studies, the MDS-UPDRS serves as a valuable tool for assessing treatment outcomes, conducting clinical trials, and comparing the efficacy of different therapeutic approaches in Parkinson's disease.

o  Researchers use the scale to quantify changes in symptoms over time, evaluate the impact of interventions on motor and non-motor features, and standardize assessments across multiple study sites.

6.    Limitations:

o While the MDS-UPDRS provides a comprehensive evaluation of Parkinson's disease symptoms, it may not capture all aspects of the disease experience or individual variations in symptom presentation.

o Clinicians and researchers should consider supplementing the MDS-UPDRS with additional assessments or measures to obtain a more holistic understanding of the patient's condition.

In summary, the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is a valuable tool for assessing the motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, guiding treatment decisions, and monitoring disease progression in clinical practice and research settings.

 

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ensembles of Decision Trees

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Ensembles? Ensemble methods combine multiple machine learning models to create more powerful and robust models. By aggregating the predictions of many models, ensembles typically achieve better generalization performance than any single model. In the context of decision trees, ensembles combine multiple trees to overcome limitations of single trees such as overfitting and instability. 2. Why Ensemble Decision Trees? Single decision trees: Are easy to interpret but tend to overfit training data, leading to poor generalization,. Can be unstable because small variations in data can change the structure of the tree significantly. Ensemble methods exploit the idea that many weak learners (trees that individually overfit or only capture partial patterns) can be combined to form a strong learner by reducing variance and sometimes bias. 3. Two Main Types of Tree Ensembles (a) Random Forests Random forests are ensembles con...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment
Read more