Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS)

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) is a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that has gained attention in neuroscience and clinical research for its ability to modulate cortical excitability and induce lasting effects on brain function. Here is an overview of Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS):


1.      Definition:

oTheta Burst Stimulation (TBS) is a patterned form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that involves delivering bursts of magnetic pulses at a specific frequency (typically theta frequency, around 5 Hz) to targeted regions of the brain.

2.     Types of TBS:

o    There are two main types of Theta Burst Stimulation:

§ Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation (cTBS): Involves continuous bursts of stimulation over a period of time, typically leading to inhibitory effects on cortical excitability.

§Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS): Involves intermittent bursts of stimulation with short breaks in between, often resulting in facilitatory effects on cortical excitability.

3.     Effects on Cortical Excitability:

oTBS protocols have been shown to induce changes in cortical excitability that outlast the stimulation period. Inhibitory TBS can lead to long-term depression (LTD) of synaptic activity, while facilitatory TBS can induce long-term potentiation (LTP), resembling mechanisms of synaptic plasticity.

4.    Research and Therapeutic Applications:

oTBS has been widely used in research settings to investigate neural plasticity, motor learning, and cognitive functions. It is also being explored as a potential therapeutic tool for various neurological and psychiatric conditions.

5.     Clinical Applications:

oTBS has shown promise in the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders, including depression, schizophrenia, chronic pain, stroke rehabilitation, and movement disorders like Parkinson's disease. It is being studied as a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with potential therapeutic benefits.

6.    Targeted Brain Regions:

oTBS can be applied to specific brain regions based on the research or clinical objectives. Common targets include the primary motor cortex (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), cerebellum, and other areas implicated in motor control, mood regulation, and cognitive functions.

7.     Safety and Efficacy:

oTBS is generally considered safe when administered by trained professionals following established protocols. It is non-invasive and well-tolerated by most individuals. However, individual responses to TBS may vary, and its long-term effects are still being studied.

In summary, Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) is a specialized form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation that can modulate cortical excitability and induce lasting changes in brain function. Its potential applications in research and clinical settings make it a valuable tool for studying neural plasticity and exploring therapeutic interventions for various neurological and psychiatric conditions.

 

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ensembles of Decision Trees

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Ensembles? Ensemble methods combine multiple machine learning models to create more powerful and robust models. By aggregating the predictions of many models, ensembles typically achieve better generalization performance than any single model. In the context of decision trees, ensembles combine multiple trees to overcome limitations of single trees such as overfitting and instability. 2. Why Ensemble Decision Trees? Single decision trees: Are easy to interpret but tend to overfit training data, leading to poor generalization,. Can be unstable because small variations in data can change the structure of the tree significantly. Ensemble methods exploit the idea that many weak learners (trees that individually overfit or only capture partial patterns) can be combined to form a strong learner by reducing variance and sometimes bias. 3. Two Main Types of Tree Ensembles (a) Random Forests Random forests are ensembles con...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment
Read more