Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Periodic Epileptiform Discharges Compared to Environmental Device Artifacts

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

Periodic Epileptiform Discharges (PEDs) can sometimes be mistaken for environmental device artifacts due to their periodic nature. However, there are several key differences that help distinguish between these two types of EEG patterns. 

Comparison of Periodic Epileptiform Discharges (PEDs) and Environmental Device Artifacts:

1.      Waveform Characteristics:

§  PEDs: Typically exhibit a triphasic waveform, characterized by a sharply contoured initial spike followed by a slow wave. This specific morphology is consistent and indicative of epileptiform activity.

§  Environmental Device Artifacts: These artifacts may have a regular interval and can appear similar to PEDs, but they usually lack the distinct triphasic waveform. The waveforms may be more irregular and do not conform to the typical patterns seen in PEDs.

2.     Distribution:

§  PEDs: Often localized to specific regions of the scalp, particularly in cases of focal brain lesions or encephalopathy. They can be bilateral but typically show a more defined distribution.

§  Environmental Device Artifacts: These artifacts may not have a consistent distribution and can appear across multiple electrodes without a clear pattern. They often do not correspond to the anatomical distribution of brain activity.

3.     Inter-discharge Interval:

§  PEDs: Characterized by regular inter-discharge intervals, often occurring at consistent time intervals (e.g., every 1 to 2 seconds).

§  Environmental Device Artifacts: While they may appear periodic, the intervals can be irregular and do not follow a predictable pattern. The timing may vary based on the device's operation or external factors.

4.    Response to Movement:

§  PEDs: Generally remain stable and do not change significantly with patient movement or external stimuli. They are intrinsic to the brain's electrical activity.

§  Environmental Device Artifacts: Often change in amplitude or morphology with patient movement or changes in the environment. They may be influenced by the proximity of the device to the electrodes.

5.     Clinical Context:

§  PEDs: Associated with specific neurological conditions, such as encephalopathy, seizures, or brain lesions. Their presence is clinically significant and warrants further investigation.

§  Environmental Device Artifacts: Typically arise from external sources, such as electrical devices or equipment, and are not indicative of neurological dysfunction. They are often considered noise in the EEG recording.

6.    Background Activity:

§  PEDs: Usually accompanied by low-amplitude background activity, which may be disorganized or show slowing.

§  Environmental Device Artifacts: The background activity may remain unchanged, but the artifacts can obscure the underlying EEG signals without a corresponding change in the brain's electrical activity.

Summary:

While both Periodic Epileptiform Discharges (PEDs) and environmental device artifacts can present as rhythmic patterns on an EEG, they can be distinguished by their waveform characteristics, distribution, inter-discharge intervals, response to movement, clinical context, and accompanying background activity. Recognizing these differences is essential for accurate interpretation of EEG recordings and appropriate clinical management.

 

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ensembles of Decision Trees

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Ensembles? Ensemble methods combine multiple machine learning models to create more powerful and robust models. By aggregating the predictions of many models, ensembles typically achieve better generalization performance than any single model. In the context of decision trees, ensembles combine multiple trees to overcome limitations of single trees such as overfitting and instability. 2. Why Ensemble Decision Trees? Single decision trees: Are easy to interpret but tend to overfit training data, leading to poor generalization,. Can be unstable because small variations in data can change the structure of the tree significantly. Ensemble methods exploit the idea that many weak learners (trees that individually overfit or only capture partial patterns) can be combined to form a strong learner by reducing variance and sometimes bias. 3. Two Main Types of Tree Ensembles (a) Random Forests Random forests are ensembles con...
Post a Comment
Read more

Predicting Probabilities

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is Predicting Probabilities? The predict_proba method estimates the probability that a given input belongs to each class. It returns values in the range [0, 1] , representing the model's confidence as probabilities. The sum of predicted probabilities across all classes for a sample is always 1 (i.e., they form a valid probability distribution). 2. Output Shape of predict_proba For binary classification , the shape of the output is (n_samples, 2) : Column 0: Probability of the sample belonging to the negative class. Column 1: Probability of the sample belonging to the positive class. For multiclass classification , the shape is (n_samples, n_classes) , with each column corresponding to the probability of the sample belonging to that class. 3. Interpretation of predict_proba Output The probability reflects how confidently the model believes a data point belongs to each class. For example, in ...
Post a Comment
Read more