Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Phantom Spike and Wave compared to 14 & 6 Positive Bursts

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

Phantom Spike and Wave (PhSW) and 14 & 6 Positive Bursts are both EEG patterns that can appear similar but have distinct characteristics and clinical implications. 

Phantom Spike and Wave (PhSW)

    • Definition: PhSW is characterized by bursts of spike and wave complexes that are often low in amplitude and can be difficult to identify due to the subtlety of the spikes.
    • Frequency: Typically occurs at a frequency of about 5 to 7 Hz, but can sometimes be observed at 4 Hz, which overlaps with generalized interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs).
    • Amplitude: The spikes are usually small, often less than 40 μV, and the slow wave typically has an amplitude of less than 50 μV.
    • Location: PhSW is often maximal along the midline and can be recorded from frontal or occipital regions, depending on the specific type (WHAM or FOLD).
    • Clinical Significance: PhSW is commonly considered a normal variant but is associated with an increased prevalence of epilepsy in some patients. It may occur in the context of non-specific symptoms like headache or dizziness.

14 & 6 Positive Bursts

    • Definition: This pattern consists of bilaterally synchronous bursts of 14 and 6 Hz activity, which can appear similar to PhSW but is distinct in its characteristics.
    • Frequency: The 14 & 6 Positive Bursts occur at a frequency of 6 Hz, which is a key distinguishing feature from PhSW 30.
    • Amplitude: The amplitude of the bursts can vary, but they are generally more pronounced than the low-amplitude spikes seen in PhSW.
    • Location: This pattern typically occurs bilaterally and synchronously, often in the frontal regions, and can be confused with PhSW due to the similar frequency.
    • Clinical Significance: The 14 & 6 Positive Bursts are often associated with benign conditions and are typically not indicative of epilepsy. They may be seen in healthy individuals or in the context of certain benign neurological conditions.

Key Differences

Feature

Phantom Spike and Wave (PhSW)

14 & 6 Positive Bursts

Frequency

5 to 7 Hz (sometimes 4 Hz)

6 Hz

Amplitude

Low amplitude (often < 40 μV)

Generally more pronounced

Location

Maximal along the midline, frontal or occipital

Typically bilateral and synchronous, often frontal

Clinical Significance

May indicate increased prevalence of epilepsy; often a normal variant

Generally benign; not typically associated with epilepsy

 

Summary

While both Phantom Spike and Wave and 14 & 6 Positive Bursts can appear similar on EEG, they differ significantly in frequency, amplitude, and clinical implications. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate diagnosis and management of patients presenting with these EEG patterns.


Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Predicting Probabilities

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is Predicting Probabilities? The predict_proba method estimates the probability that a given input belongs to each class. It returns values in the range [0, 1] , representing the model's confidence as probabilities. The sum of predicted probabilities across all classes for a sample is always 1 (i.e., they form a valid probability distribution). 2. Output Shape of predict_proba For binary classification , the shape of the output is (n_samples, 2) : Column 0: Probability of the sample belonging to the negative class. Column 1: Probability of the sample belonging to the positive class. For multiclass classification , the shape is (n_samples, n_classes) , with each column corresponding to the probability of the sample belonging to that class. 3. Interpretation of predict_proba Output The probability reflects how confidently the model believes a data point belongs to each class. For example, in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ensembles of Decision Trees

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Ensembles? Ensemble methods combine multiple machine learning models to create more powerful and robust models. By aggregating the predictions of many models, ensembles typically achieve better generalization performance than any single model. In the context of decision trees, ensembles combine multiple trees to overcome limitations of single trees such as overfitting and instability. 2. Why Ensemble Decision Trees? Single decision trees: Are easy to interpret but tend to overfit training data, leading to poor generalization,. Can be unstable because small variations in data can change the structure of the tree significantly. Ensemble methods exploit the idea that many weak learners (trees that individually overfit or only capture partial patterns) can be combined to form a strong learner by reducing variance and sometimes bias. 3. Two Main Types of Tree Ensembles (a) Random Forests Random forests are ensembles con...
Post a Comment
Read more