Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Periodic Epileptiform Discharges Compared to Interictal Epileptiform Discharges

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

Periodic Epileptiform Discharges (PEDs) and Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) are both types of abnormal EEG patterns associated with epilepsy, but they have distinct characteristics and clinical implications. 

Comparison of Periodic Epileptiform Discharges (PEDs) and Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs):

1.      Waveform Characteristics:

§  PEDs: Typically exhibit a triphasic waveform, characterized by a sharply contoured initial spike followed by a slow wave. This morphology is consistent and can be recognized as a specific pattern associated with periodic discharges.

§  IEDs: These can vary in morphology but are generally characterized by sharp waves or spikes that may not follow a specific triphasic pattern. IEDs can have one or several phases and are often more variable in appearance.

2.     Frequency and Timing:

§  PEDs: Characterized by periodicity, with discharges occurring at regular intervals (e.g., every 1 to 2 seconds). The timing is consistent and predictable, which is a hallmark of PEDs.

§  IEDs: These discharges are not necessarily periodic and can occur sporadically throughout the EEG recording. They may appear at irregular intervals and do not have a predictable timing pattern.

3.     Clinical Context:

§  PEDs: Often associated with specific conditions such as encephalopathy, metabolic disturbances, or structural brain lesions. Their presence is clinically significant and may indicate a more severe underlying condition.

§  IEDs: Typically associated with epilepsy and can occur in patients with a history of seizures. They are indicative of a predisposition to seizures but do not necessarily correlate with ongoing seizure activity.

4.    Duration:

§  PEDs: The total complex duration of PEDs usually ranges from 100 to 300 milliseconds, and they are characterized by their periodic nature.

§  IEDs: The duration of IEDs can vary widely, and they may last for shorter or longer periods depending on the specific type of discharge.

5.     Background Activity:

§  PEDs: Usually accompanied by low-amplitude background activity, which may be disorganized or show slowing. The background may reflect diffuse cerebral dysfunction.

§  IEDs: The background activity can vary and may be normal or abnormal, depending on the underlying condition. IEDs can occur against a background of normal EEG or in the presence of other abnormal patterns.

6.    Prognostic Implications:

§  PEDs: Generally associated with a worse prognosis compared to IEDs, as they often indicate more severe underlying brain dysfunction or structural changes.

§  IEDs: While they indicate a risk for seizures, the prognosis can vary widely depending on the underlying etiology and the patient's clinical context.

Summary:

Periodic Epileptiform Discharges (PEDs) and Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) differ in their waveform characteristics, frequency and timing, clinical context, duration, background activity, and prognostic implications. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate EEG interpretation and appropriate clinical management.

 

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ensembles of Decision Trees

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Ensembles? Ensemble methods combine multiple machine learning models to create more powerful and robust models. By aggregating the predictions of many models, ensembles typically achieve better generalization performance than any single model. In the context of decision trees, ensembles combine multiple trees to overcome limitations of single trees such as overfitting and instability. 2. Why Ensemble Decision Trees? Single decision trees: Are easy to interpret but tend to overfit training data, leading to poor generalization,. Can be unstable because small variations in data can change the structure of the tree significantly. Ensemble methods exploit the idea that many weak learners (trees that individually overfit or only capture partial patterns) can be combined to form a strong learner by reducing variance and sometimes bias. 3. Two Main Types of Tree Ensembles (a) Random Forests Random forests are ensembles con...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Neural Networks in Machine Learning

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Introduction to Neural Networks Neural networks are a family of models inspired by the biological neural networks in the brain. They consist of layers of interconnected nodes ("neurons"), which transform input data through a series of nonlinear operations to produce outputs. Neural networks are versatile and can model complex patterns and relationships, making them foundational in modern machine learning and deep learning. 2. Basic Structure: Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs) The simplest neural networks are Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs) , also called vanilla feed-forward neural networks . MLPs consist of: Input layer : Receives features. Hidden layers : One or more layers that perform nonlinear transformations. Output layer : Produces the final prediction (classification or regression). Each neuron in one layer connects to every neuron in the next layer via weighted links. Computation progresses f...
Post a Comment
Read more