Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Periodic Epileptiform Discharges Compared to Interictal Epileptiform Discharges

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

Periodic Epileptiform Discharges (PEDs) and Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) are both types of abnormal EEG patterns associated with epilepsy, but they have distinct characteristics and clinical implications. 

Comparison of Periodic Epileptiform Discharges (PEDs) and Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs):

1.      Waveform Characteristics:

§  PEDs: Typically exhibit a triphasic waveform, characterized by a sharply contoured initial spike followed by a slow wave. This morphology is consistent and can be recognized as a specific pattern associated with periodic discharges.

§  IEDs: These can vary in morphology but are generally characterized by sharp waves or spikes that may not follow a specific triphasic pattern. IEDs can have one or several phases and are often more variable in appearance.

2.     Frequency and Timing:

§  PEDs: Characterized by periodicity, with discharges occurring at regular intervals (e.g., every 1 to 2 seconds). The timing is consistent and predictable, which is a hallmark of PEDs.

§  IEDs: These discharges are not necessarily periodic and can occur sporadically throughout the EEG recording. They may appear at irregular intervals and do not have a predictable timing pattern.

3.     Clinical Context:

§  PEDs: Often associated with specific conditions such as encephalopathy, metabolic disturbances, or structural brain lesions. Their presence is clinically significant and may indicate a more severe underlying condition.

§  IEDs: Typically associated with epilepsy and can occur in patients with a history of seizures. They are indicative of a predisposition to seizures but do not necessarily correlate with ongoing seizure activity.

4.    Duration:

§  PEDs: The total complex duration of PEDs usually ranges from 100 to 300 milliseconds, and they are characterized by their periodic nature.

§  IEDs: The duration of IEDs can vary widely, and they may last for shorter or longer periods depending on the specific type of discharge.

5.     Background Activity:

§  PEDs: Usually accompanied by low-amplitude background activity, which may be disorganized or show slowing. The background may reflect diffuse cerebral dysfunction.

§  IEDs: The background activity can vary and may be normal or abnormal, depending on the underlying condition. IEDs can occur against a background of normal EEG or in the presence of other abnormal patterns.

6.    Prognostic Implications:

§  PEDs: Generally associated with a worse prognosis compared to IEDs, as they often indicate more severe underlying brain dysfunction or structural changes.

§  IEDs: While they indicate a risk for seizures, the prognosis can vary widely depending on the underlying etiology and the patient's clinical context.

Summary:

Periodic Epileptiform Discharges (PEDs) and Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) differ in their waveform characteristics, frequency and timing, clinical context, duration, background activity, and prognostic implications. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate EEG interpretation and appropriate clinical management.

 

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Predicting Probabilities

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is Predicting Probabilities? The predict_proba method estimates the probability that a given input belongs to each class. It returns values in the range [0, 1] , representing the model's confidence as probabilities. The sum of predicted probabilities across all classes for a sample is always 1 (i.e., they form a valid probability distribution). 2. Output Shape of predict_proba For binary classification , the shape of the output is (n_samples, 2) : Column 0: Probability of the sample belonging to the negative class. Column 1: Probability of the sample belonging to the positive class. For multiclass classification , the shape is (n_samples, n_classes) , with each column corresponding to the probability of the sample belonging to that class. 3. Interpretation of predict_proba Output The probability reflects how confidently the model believes a data point belongs to each class. For example, in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty in Multiclass Classification

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is Uncertainty in Classification? Uncertainty refers to the model’s confidence or doubt in its predictions. Quantifying uncertainty is important to understand how reliable each prediction is. In multiclass classification , uncertainty estimates provide probabilities over multiple classes, reflecting how sure the model is about each possible class. 2. Methods to Estimate Uncertainty in Multiclass Classification Most multiclass classifiers provide methods such as: predict_proba: Returns a probability distribution across all classes. decision_function: Returns scores or margins for each class (sometimes called raw or uncalibrated confidence scores). The probability distribution from predict_proba captures the uncertainty by assigning a probability to each class. 3. Shape and Interpretation of predict_proba in Multiclass Output shape: (n_samples, n_classes) Each row corresponds to the probabilities of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Decision Functions

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is the Decision Function? The decision_function method is provided by many classifiers in scikit-learn. It returns a continuous score for each sample, representing the classifier’s confidence or margin. This score reflects how strongly the model favors one class over another in binary classification, or a more complex set of scores in multiclass classification. 2. Shape and Output of decision_function For binary classification , the output shape is (n_samples,). Each value is a floating-point number indicating the degree to which the sample belongs to the positive class. Positive values indicate a preference for the positive class; negative values indicate a preference for the negative class. For multiclass classification , the output is usually a 2D array of shape (n_samples, n_classes), providing scores for each class. 3. Interpretation of decision_function Scores The sign of the value (positive or...
Post a Comment
Read more