Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Greebles

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

Greebles are a category of computer-generated novel objects that were originally designed as a control set for studying face recognition and perceptual expertise. 

1.     Definition:

    • Greebles are artificial, three-dimensional objects created for research purposes to investigate visual perception, object recognition, and cognitive processes related to expertise and categorization.
    • Unlike natural objects or faces, Greebles have no real-world counterparts and are specifically designed to be visually complex stimuli for experimental studies.

2.     Purpose:

    • Greebles were developed by psychologists as a non-face control stimulus to study face recognition abilities and perceptual expertise in individuals, particularly in the context of cognitive neuroscience and experimental psychology.
    • By using Greebles as stimuli in research experiments, scientists can explore how individuals perceive and categorize complex visual stimuli that do not have inherent meaning or familiarity.

3.     Research Applications:

    • Greebles have been widely used in cognitive psychology and neuroscience research to investigate visual processing, object recognition, perceptual learning, and the development of expertise in visual tasks.
    • Studies using Greebles have provided insights into the neural mechanisms underlying face perception, the effects of training on object recognition, and the generalization of perceptual skills to novel stimuli.

4.     Experimental Design:

    • Researchers often use Greebles in controlled experiments to assess participants' ability to discriminate between different Greeble exemplars, detect subtle variations in Greeble configurations, and generalize learning to new Greeble stimuli.
    • By manipulating Greeble features, orientations, and configurations, researchers can study how perceptual expertise develops, how visual discrimination skills improve with practice, and how the brain processes complex visual information.

5.     Contribution to Science:

    • The use of Greebles in experimental studies has advanced our understanding of visual perception, object recognition, and the neural mechanisms involved in processing novel and complex visual stimuli.
    • Greebles have provided researchers with a valuable tool for studying cognitive processes, perceptual learning, and the development of expertise in visual tasks, offering insights into the organization and plasticity of the human brain.

In summary, Greebles are artificial objects created for research purposes to study visual perception, object recognition, and cognitive processes related to expertise and categorization. Their use in experimental studies has contributed to our understanding of visual processing, perceptual learning, and the neural mechanisms underlying complex visual tasks in cognitive psychology and neuroscience research.

 

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Predicting Probabilities

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is Predicting Probabilities? The predict_proba method estimates the probability that a given input belongs to each class. It returns values in the range [0, 1] , representing the model's confidence as probabilities. The sum of predicted probabilities across all classes for a sample is always 1 (i.e., they form a valid probability distribution). 2. Output Shape of predict_proba For binary classification , the shape of the output is (n_samples, 2) : Column 0: Probability of the sample belonging to the negative class. Column 1: Probability of the sample belonging to the positive class. For multiclass classification , the shape is (n_samples, n_classes) , with each column corresponding to the probability of the sample belonging to that class. 3. Interpretation of predict_proba Output The probability reflects how confidently the model believes a data point belongs to each class. For example, in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty in Multiclass Classification

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What is Uncertainty in Classification? Uncertainty refers to the model’s confidence or doubt in its predictions. Quantifying uncertainty is important to understand how reliable each prediction is. In multiclass classification , uncertainty estimates provide probabilities over multiple classes, reflecting how sure the model is about each possible class. 2. Methods to Estimate Uncertainty in Multiclass Classification Most multiclass classifiers provide methods such as: predict_proba: Returns a probability distribution across all classes. decision_function: Returns scores or margins for each class (sometimes called raw or uncalibrated confidence scores). The probability distribution from predict_proba captures the uncertainty by assigning a probability to each class. 3. Shape and Interpretation of predict_proba in Multiclass Output shape: (n_samples, n_classes) Each row corresponds to the probabilities of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Conducting a Qualitative Analysis

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Conducting a qualitative analysis in biomechanics involves a systematic process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting non-numerical data to gain insights into human movement patterns, behaviors, and interactions. Here are the key steps involved in conducting a qualitative analysis in biomechanics: 1.     Data Collection : o     Use appropriate data collection methods such as video recordings, observational notes, interviews, or focus groups to capture qualitative information about human movement. o     Ensure that data collection is conducted in a systematic and consistent manner to gather rich and detailed insights. 2.     Data Organization : o     Organize the collected qualitative data systematically, such as transcribing interviews, categorizing observational notes, or indexing video recordings for easy reference during analysis. o     Use qualitative data management tools or software to f...
Post a Comment
Read more