Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Sensitive of surface morphology with respect to Cortical Thickness

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

The sensitivity of surface morphology with respect to cortical thickness is a critical aspect in understanding the development and folding of the cerebral cortex. Here are some key points regarding the sensitivity of surface morphology to cortical thickness:


1.  Effect on Folding Patterns: The cortical thickness plays a significant role in determining the folding patterns of the cerebral cortex. Changes in cortical thickness can lead to alterations in the depth and complexity of cortical folds, influencing the overall surface morphology of the brain.


2.  Gyral Wavelength: Cortical thickness directly influences the gyral wavelength, which refers to the distance between adjacent cortical folds. Thicker cortices tend to have longer gyral wavelengths, resulting in smoother brain surfaces, while thinner cortices lead to shorter gyral wavelengths and increased cortical folding.


3.  Primary Folding: The primary folding of the cortex, characterized by the formation of gyri and sulci, is highly sensitive to variations in cortical thickness. Thicker cortices are associated with shallower folds, whereas thinner cortices exhibit more pronounced folding patterns.


4. Neurological Disorders: Abnormalities in cortical thickness can impact brain function and are associated with various neurological disorders. For example, conditions like lissencephaly (thickened cortex) and polymicrogyria (regionally thinned cortex) are linked to disruptions in cortical thickness and folding patterns.


5.     Surface-to-Volume Ratio: Changes in cortical thickness can affect the surface-to-volume ratio of the brain. Thicker cortices result in a smaller surface area relative to volume, while thinner cortices increase the surface area-to-volume ratio. These variations have implications for brain function and connectivity.


6.     Mechanical Properties: The mechanical properties of the cortex, such as stiffness and elasticity, interact with cortical thickness to influence surface morphology. Thicker cortices with different mechanical properties may exhibit distinct folding patterns compared to thinner cortices.


7.     Computational Modeling: Computational models can simulate the sensitivity of surface morphology to cortical thickness by varying this parameter and observing the resulting changes in cortical folding patterns. These models provide insights into how cortical thickness influences brain structure and function.


Understanding the sensitivity of surface morphology to cortical thickness is essential for elucidating the mechanisms underlying cortical folding and brain development. By investigating the relationship between cortical thickness and folding patterns, researchers can gain valuable insights into the factors shaping the complex structure of the cerebral cortex and their implications for brain function and pathology.

 

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ensembles of Decision Trees

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Ensembles? Ensemble methods combine multiple machine learning models to create more powerful and robust models. By aggregating the predictions of many models, ensembles typically achieve better generalization performance than any single model. In the context of decision trees, ensembles combine multiple trees to overcome limitations of single trees such as overfitting and instability. 2. Why Ensemble Decision Trees? Single decision trees: Are easy to interpret but tend to overfit training data, leading to poor generalization,. Can be unstable because small variations in data can change the structure of the tree significantly. Ensemble methods exploit the idea that many weak learners (trees that individually overfit or only capture partial patterns) can be combined to form a strong learner by reducing variance and sometimes bias. 3. Two Main Types of Tree Ensembles (a) Random Forests Random forests are ensembles con...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Prerequisite Knowledge for a Quantitative Analysis

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
To conduct a quantitative analysis in biomechanics, researchers and practitioners require a solid foundation in various key areas. Here are some prerequisite knowledge areas essential for performing quantitative analysis in biomechanics: 1.     Anatomy and Physiology : o     Understanding the structure and function of the human body, including bones, muscles, joints, and organs, is crucial for biomechanical analysis. o     Knowledge of anatomical terminology, muscle actions, joint movements, and physiological processes provides the basis for analyzing human movement. 2.     Physics : o     Knowledge of classical mechanics, including concepts of force, motion, energy, and momentum, is fundamental for understanding the principles underlying biomechanical analysis. o     Understanding Newton's laws of motion, principles of equilibrium, and concepts of work, energy, and power is essential for quantifyi...
1 comment
Read more