Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...

Sensitive of surface morphology with respect to Growth Ratio

The sensitivity of surface morphology with respect to the growth ratio between the cortex and subcortex is a critical aspect in understanding the mechanisms of cortical folding and brain development. Here are some key points regarding the sensitivity of surface morphology to the growth ratio:


1.     Secondary Folds Formation: The growth ratio between the cortex and subcortex is a key parameter controlling the formation of secondary folds in the cerebral cortex. Variations in the growth ratio can lead to changes in the complexity and distribution of cortical folds, influencing the overall surface morphology of the brain.


2.     Impact on Folding Patterns: The growth ratio influences the rate and extent of cortical growth, which in turn affects the folding patterns of the cortex. Variations in the growth ratio can result in alterations in the depth, frequency, and orientation of cortical folds, shaping the overall morphology of the brain surface.


3. Mechanotransduction Pathways: The growth ratio between the cortex and subcortex is linked to Mechanotransduction pathways that regulate cellular responses to mechanical stimuli. Changes in the growth ratio can modulate these pathways, leading to alterations in cell growth, proliferation, and tissue remodeling, which impact cortical folding patterns.


4.     Computational Modeling: Computational models can simulate the sensitivity of surface morphology to variations in the growth ratio by adjusting this parameter and observing the resulting changes in cortical folding patterns. These models provide insights into how the growth ratio influences the morphological features and structural organization of the cerebral cortex.


5.   Cellular Mechanisms: The growth ratio is closely tied to cellular mechanisms such as axon elongation, cell proliferation, and tissue growth, which collectively contribute to cortical development and folding. Understanding the interplay between the growth ratio and cellular processes is essential for unraveling the complexities of brain morphogenesis.


6.     Clinical Implications: Abnormalities in the growth ratio between cortical layers have been implicated in various neurodevelopmental disorders and brain pathologies. Investigating the sensitivity of surface morphology to the growth ratio can provide valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms of these conditions and potential therapeutic targets.


7.  Biological Significance: The growth ratio is a fundamental parameter that governs the dynamic changes in brain structure during development. It reflects the intricate balance between cortical and subcortical growth processes and their impact on cortical folding, highlighting the biological significance of the growth ratio in shaping brain morphology.


By exploring the sensitivity of surface morphology to the growth ratio, researchers can enhance their understanding of the mechanical and biological factors that drive cortical folding and brain development. This knowledge is essential for deciphering the complex interplay between growth processes, cellular mechanisms, and structural changes in the developing brain.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....

Linear Models

1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...

Predicting Probabilities

1. What is Predicting Probabilities? The predict_proba method estimates the probability that a given input belongs to each class. It returns values in the range [0, 1] , representing the model's confidence as probabilities. The sum of predicted probabilities across all classes for a sample is always 1 (i.e., they form a valid probability distribution). 2. Output Shape of predict_proba For binary classification , the shape of the output is (n_samples, 2) : Column 0: Probability of the sample belonging to the negative class. Column 1: Probability of the sample belonging to the positive class. For multiclass classification , the shape is (n_samples, n_classes) , with each column corresponding to the probability of the sample belonging to that class. 3. Interpretation of predict_proba Output The probability reflects how confidently the model believes a data point belongs to each class. For example, in ...

Uncertainty in Multiclass Classification

1. What is Uncertainty in Classification? Uncertainty refers to the model’s confidence or doubt in its predictions. Quantifying uncertainty is important to understand how reliable each prediction is. In multiclass classification , uncertainty estimates provide probabilities over multiple classes, reflecting how sure the model is about each possible class. 2. Methods to Estimate Uncertainty in Multiclass Classification Most multiclass classifiers provide methods such as: predict_proba: Returns a probability distribution across all classes. decision_function: Returns scores or margins for each class (sometimes called raw or uncalibrated confidence scores). The probability distribution from predict_proba captures the uncertainty by assigning a probability to each class. 3. Shape and Interpretation of predict_proba in Multiclass Output shape: (n_samples, n_classes) Each row corresponds to the probabilities of ...

The Decision Functions

1. What is the Decision Function? The decision_function method is provided by many classifiers in scikit-learn. It returns a continuous score for each sample, representing the classifier’s confidence or margin. This score reflects how strongly the model favors one class over another in binary classification, or a more complex set of scores in multiclass classification. 2. Shape and Output of decision_function For binary classification , the output shape is (n_samples,). Each value is a floating-point number indicating the degree to which the sample belongs to the positive class. Positive values indicate a preference for the positive class; negative values indicate a preference for the negative class. For multiclass classification , the output is usually a 2D array of shape (n_samples, n_classes), providing scores for each class. 3. Interpretation of decision_function Scores The sign of the value (positive or...