Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment

Comparisons of Experimental and Control Groups

Image
Dr. Rishabh Pathak

Experimental and control groups are essential components of experimental research designs used to investigate causal relationships between variables. Here is a comparison of experimental and control groups in research:


1.    Definition:

o    Experimental Group: The experimental group in a study receives the experimental treatment or intervention being tested by the researcher. This group is exposed to the independent variable(s) under investigation to observe the effects on the dependent variable(s).

o  Control Group: The control group serves as a baseline or comparison group in the study. It does not receive the experimental treatment and is used to compare the outcomes or effects observed in the experimental group to determine the impact of the intervention.

2.    Purpose:

o    Experimental Group: The experimental group allows researchers to test the effects of the independent variable(s) by exposing participants to specific conditions, treatments, or interventions. It helps determine whether the manipulation of the independent variable cause’s changes in the dependent variable.

o    Control Group: The control group provides a reference point for comparison with the experimental group. By not receiving the experimental treatment, the control group helps researchers assess the baseline or natural state of the dependent variable and evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.

3.    Treatment:

o    Experimental Group: Participants in the experimental group are exposed to the experimental treatment or condition being studied. This treatment may involve receiving a new drug, undergoing a specific intervention, or experiencing a manipulated variable to test its effects.

o    Control Group: Participants in the control group do not receive the experimental treatment and are maintained under standard or neutral conditions. This group helps researchers isolate the effects of the independent variable by providing a comparison against which to evaluate the outcomes in the experimental group.

4.    Comparison:

o    Experimental Group: The experimental group is subjected to the experimental manipulation or intervention to observe changes in the dependent variable. Any differences in outcomes between the pre-test and post-test measurements within the experimental group are attributed to the effects of the independent variable.

o    Control Group: The control group serves as a reference group that allows researchers to assess the natural progression or baseline levels of the dependent variable in the absence of the experimental treatment. By comparing outcomes between the control and experimental groups, researchers can determine the impact of the intervention.

5.    Validity:

o    Internal Validity: Both the experimental and control groups are crucial for establishing internal validity in research. By comparing outcomes between the two groups, researchers can control for confounding variables, minimize bias, and determine whether the observed effects are truly due to the experimental manipulation.

o    External Validity: The use of control groups enhances the external validity of the study by providing a basis for generalizing the results to a broader population or setting. Comparing outcomes between the control and experimental groups helps researchers assess the applicability of the findings beyond the study sample.

6.    Examples:

o  Experimental Group: In a drug trial, the experimental group receives the new medication being tested, while the control group receives a placebo or standard treatment.

o    Control Group: In an educational intervention study, the control group follows the regular curriculum, while the experimental group receives additional tutoring or support to assess its impact on academic performance.

In experimental research, the comparison between the experimental and control groups is essential for evaluating the effects of interventions, establishing causal relationships, and drawing valid conclusions based on the observed outcomes. The use of control groups enhances the rigor and reliability of research findings by providing a basis for comparison and interpretation of results.

 

Categories:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....
Post a Comment
Read more

Linear Models

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ensembles of Decision Trees

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. What are Ensembles? Ensemble methods combine multiple machine learning models to create more powerful and robust models. By aggregating the predictions of many models, ensembles typically achieve better generalization performance than any single model. In the context of decision trees, ensembles combine multiple trees to overcome limitations of single trees such as overfitting and instability. 2. Why Ensemble Decision Trees? Single decision trees: Are easy to interpret but tend to overfit training data, leading to poor generalization,. Can be unstable because small variations in data can change the structure of the tree significantly. Ensemble methods exploit the idea that many weak learners (trees that individually overfit or only capture partial patterns) can be combined to form a strong learner by reducing variance and sometimes bias. 3. Two Main Types of Tree Ensembles (a) Random Forests Random forests are ensembles con...
Post a Comment
Read more

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

Dr. Rishabh Pathak
1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...
Post a Comment
Read more