Skip to main content

Unveiling Hidden Neural Codes: SIMPL – A Scalable and Fast Approach for Optimizing Latent Variables and Tuning Curves in Neural Population Data

This research paper presents SIMPL (Scalable Iterative Maximization of Population-coded Latents), a novel, computationally efficient algorithm designed to refine the estimation of latent variables and tuning curves from neural population activity. Latent variables in neural data represent essential low-dimensional quantities encoding behavioral or cognitive states, which neuroscientists seek to identify to understand brain computations better. Background and Motivation Traditional approaches commonly assume the observed behavioral variable as the latent neural code. However, this assumption can lead to inaccuracies because neural activity sometimes encodes internal cognitive states differing subtly from observable behavior (e.g., anticipation, mental simulation). Existing latent variable models face challenges such as high computational cost, poor scalability to large datasets, limited expressiveness of tuning models, or difficulties interpreting complex neural network-based functio...

Synaptic Deficits In Psychiatric Disorders

Synaptic deficits are a common feature observed in various psychiatric disorders, contributing to the pathophysiology and symptoms associated with these conditions. Here are key insights into synaptic deficits in psychiatric disorders:


1.      Schizophrenia:

o Hypoconnectivity: Schizophrenia is characterized by synaptic hypoconnectivity, involving deficits in synaptic density, dendritic spine morphology, and synaptic protein expression in brain regions like the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus.

oGlutamatergic Dysfunction: Alterations in glutamatergic neurotransmission, including NMDA receptor hypofunction and disrupted synaptic plasticity, are implicated in schizophrenia pathogenesis.

o Synaptic Pruning Abnormalities: Dysregulation of synaptic pruning processes during neurodevelopment contributes to aberrant synaptic connectivity and cognitive impairments in schizophrenia.

2.     Depression:

o    Synaptic Atrophy: Depression is associated with synaptic atrophy, reduced synaptic density, and impaired synaptic plasticity in regions like the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, affecting mood regulation and cognitive functions.

o    Neurotransmitter Imbalance: Dysregulation of monoaminergic neurotransmitters, such as serotonin and dopamine, can lead to synaptic deficits and altered synaptic transmission in depression.

oStress-Induced Changes: Chronic stress and elevated glucocorticoid levels associated with depression can impact synaptic structure and function, contributing to neuronal atrophy and synaptic loss.

3.     Bipolar Disorder:

o  Synaptic Dysfunction: Bipolar disorder is characterized by synaptic dysfunction, including alterations in synaptic plasticity mechanisms, neurotransmitter release, and dendritic spine morphology in brain regions like the amygdala and prefrontal cortex.

o    Excitatory/Inhibitory Imbalance: Imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission, involving disruptions in glutamatergic and GABAergic signaling, is implicated in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder.

o Circadian Rhythm Disruption: Dysregulation of circadian rhythms and clock genes can impact synaptic function and neuronal connectivity in individuals with bipolar disorder.

4.    Therapeutic Implications:

o  Targeting synaptic deficits through pharmacological interventions, cognitive-behavioral therapies, and neuromodulation techniques is a key focus in the treatment of psychiatric disorders.

o Strategies aimed at restoring synaptic plasticity, rebalancing neurotransmitter systems, and promoting neuroplasticity are being explored for their therapeutic potential in managing symptoms associated with synaptic deficits in psychiatric conditions.

By elucidating the synaptic deficits present in psychiatric disorders, researchers aim to develop novel treatment approaches that target specific synaptic pathways to restore normal synaptic function, improve neural connectivity, and alleviate symptoms in affected individuals.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size

Core Concept The relationship between model complexity and dataset size is fundamental in supervised learning, affecting how well a model can learn and generalize. Model complexity refers to the capacity or flexibility of the model to fit a wide variety of functions. Dataset size refers to the number and diversity of training samples available for learning. Key Points 1. Larger Datasets Allow for More Complex Models When your dataset contains more varied data points , you can afford to use more complex models without overfitting. More data points mean more information and variety, enabling the model to learn detailed patterns without fitting noise. Quote from the book: "Relation of Model Complexity to Dataset Size. It’s important to note that model complexity is intimately tied to the variation of inputs contained in your training dataset: the larger variety of data points your dataset contains, the more complex a model you can use without overfitting....

Linear Models

1. What are Linear Models? Linear models are a class of models that make predictions using a linear function of the input features. The prediction is computed as a weighted sum of the input features plus a bias term. They have been extensively studied over more than a century and remain widely used due to their simplicity, interpretability, and effectiveness in many scenarios. 2. Mathematical Formulation For regression , the general form of a linear model's prediction is: y^ ​ = w0 ​ x0 ​ + w1 ​ x1 ​ + … + wp ​ xp ​ + b where; y^ ​ is the predicted output, xi ​ is the i-th input feature, wi ​ is the learned weight coefficient for feature xi ​ , b is the intercept (bias term), p is the number of features. In vector form: y^ ​ = wTx + b where w = ( w0 ​ , w1 ​ , ... , wp ​ ) and x = ( x0 ​ , x1 ​ , ... , xp ​ ) . 3. Interpretation and Intuition The prediction is a linear combination of features — each feature contributes prop...

Predicting Probabilities

1. What is Predicting Probabilities? The predict_proba method estimates the probability that a given input belongs to each class. It returns values in the range [0, 1] , representing the model's confidence as probabilities. The sum of predicted probabilities across all classes for a sample is always 1 (i.e., they form a valid probability distribution). 2. Output Shape of predict_proba For binary classification , the shape of the output is (n_samples, 2) : Column 0: Probability of the sample belonging to the negative class. Column 1: Probability of the sample belonging to the positive class. For multiclass classification , the shape is (n_samples, n_classes) , with each column corresponding to the probability of the sample belonging to that class. 3. Interpretation of predict_proba Output The probability reflects how confidently the model believes a data point belongs to each class. For example, in ...

Uncertainty Estimates from Classifiers

1. Overview of Uncertainty Estimates Many classifiers do more than just output a predicted class label; they also provide a measure of confidence or uncertainty in their predictions. These uncertainty estimates help understand how sure the model is about its decision , which is crucial in real-world applications where different types of errors have different consequences (e.g., medical diagnosis). 2. Why Uncertainty Matters Predictions are often thresholded to produce class labels, but this process discards the underlying probability or decision value. Knowing how confident a classifier is can: Improve decision-making by allowing deferral in uncertain cases. Aid in calibrating models. Help in evaluating the risk associated with predictions. Example: In medical testing, a false negative (missing a disease) can be worse than a false positive (extra test). 3. Methods to Obtain Uncertainty from Classifiers 3.1 ...

Ensembles of Decision Trees

1. What are Ensembles? Ensemble methods combine multiple machine learning models to create more powerful and robust models. By aggregating the predictions of many models, ensembles typically achieve better generalization performance than any single model. In the context of decision trees, ensembles combine multiple trees to overcome limitations of single trees such as overfitting and instability. 2. Why Ensemble Decision Trees? Single decision trees: Are easy to interpret but tend to overfit training data, leading to poor generalization,. Can be unstable because small variations in data can change the structure of the tree significantly. Ensemble methods exploit the idea that many weak learners (trees that individually overfit or only capture partial patterns) can be combined to form a strong learner by reducing variance and sometimes bias. 3. Two Main Types of Tree Ensembles (a) Random Forests Random forests are ensembles con...